How Republicans quietly repeal laws they don't like
Loading...
The West, Texas chemical and fertilizer plant where at least 15 were killed and more than 200 injured a few weeks ago hadn鈥檛 been fully inspected by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration since 1985. (A partial inspection in 2011 had resulted in $5,250 in fines.)
OSHA and its state partners have a total of 2,200 inspectors charged with ensuring the safety of over more than 8 million workplaces employing 130 million workers. That comes to about one inspector for every 59,000 American workers.
There鈥檚 no way it can do its job with so few resources, but OSHA has been systematically hollowed out for the years under Republican administrations and congresses that have despised the agency since its inception.
In effect, much of our nation鈥檚 worker safety laws and rules have been quietly repealed because there aren鈥檛 enough inspectors to enforce them.聽
That鈥檚 been the Republican strategy in general: When they can鈥檛 directly repeal laws they don鈥檛 like, they repeal them indirectly by hollowing them out 鈥 denying funds to fully implement them, and reducing funds to enforce them.
Consider taxes. Republicans have been unable to round up enough votes to cut taxes on big corporations and the wealthy as much as they鈥檇 like, so what do they do? They鈥檙e hollowing out the IRS. As they cut its enforcement budget 鈥 presto! 鈥 tax collections decline.
Despite an increasing number of billionaires and multi-millionaires using every tax dodge imaginable 鈥 laundering their money through phantom corporations and tax havens (Remember Mitt鈥檚 tax returns?) 鈥 the IRS鈥檚 budget has been cut by 17 percent since 2002, adjusted for inflation.
To manage the $594.5 million in additional cuts required by the sequester, the agency has announced it will furlough each of its more than 89,000 employees for at least five days this year.
This budget stinginess doesn鈥檛 save the government money. Quite the opposite. Less IRS enforcement means less revenue. It鈥檚 been estimated that every dollar invested in the IRS鈥檚 enforcement, modernization and management system reduces the federal budget deficit by $200, and that furloughing 1,800 IRS 鈥減olicemen鈥 will cost the Treasury $4.5 billion in lost revenue.
But congressional Republicans aren鈥檛 interested in more revenue. Their goal is to cut taxes on big corporations and the wealthy.
Representative Charles Boustany, the Louisiana Republican who heads the House subcommittee overseeing the IRS, says the IRS sequester cuts should stay in force. He calls for an overhaul of the tax code instead.
In a similar manner, congressional Republicans and their patrons on Wall Street who opposed the Dodd-Frank financial reform law have been hollowing out the law by making sure agencies charged with implementing it don鈥檛 have the funds they need to do the job.
As a result, much of Dodd-Frank 鈥 including the so-called 鈥淰olcker Rule鈥 restrictions on the kind of derivatives trading that got聽the Street into trouble in the first place 鈥 is still on the drawing boards.
Perhaps more than any other law, Republicans hate the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). Yet despite holding more than 33 votes to repeal it, they still haven鈥檛 succeeded.
So what do they do? Try to hollow it out. Congressional Republicans have repeatedly denied funding requests to implement Obamacare, leaving Health and Human Services (the agency charged with designing the rules under the Act and enforcing them) so shorthanded it has to delay much of it.
Even before the sequester, the agency was running on the same budget it had before Obamacare was enacted. Now it鈥檚 lost billions more.
A new insurance marketplace specifically for small business, for example, was supposed to be up and running in January. But officials now say it won鈥檛 be available until 2015 in the 33 states where the federal government will be running insurance markets known as exchanges.
This is a potentially large blow to Obamacare鈥檚 political support. A major selling point for the legislation had been providing affordable health insurance to small businesses and their employees.
Yes, and eroding political support is exactly what congressional Republicans want. They fear that Obamacare, once fully implemented, will be too popular to dismantle. So they鈥檙e out to delay it as long as possible while keeping up a drumbeat about its flaws.聽
Repealing laws by hollowing them out 鈥 failing to fund their enforcement or implementation 鈥 works because the public doesn鈥檛 know it鈥檚 happening. Enactment of a law attracts attention; de-funding it doesn鈥檛.
The strategy also seems to bolster the Republican view that government is聽 incompetent. If government can鈥檛 do what it鈥檚 supposed to do 鈥 keep workplaces safe, ensure that the rich pay taxes they owe, protect small investors, implement Obamacare 鈥 why give it any additional responsibility?
The public doesn鈥檛 know the real reason why the government isn鈥檛 doing its job is it鈥檚 being hollowed out.