Bush tax policy won't pay for Obama spending policy
Loading...
Of course, it didn鈥檛 pay for Bush spending policy, either, but the point is there鈥檚 even more of a disconnect between the revenues raised under the Obama-proposed Bush tax policy extended and projected Obama-proposed spending.
This video clip from CNN鈥檚 IOUSA Solutions special (simply titled and featuring me on the panel and my boss Bob Bixby in the film) makes this simple point: There鈥檚 a huge gap between spending and revenues, and no one solution, and in fact no 鈥渟imple鈥 solution (such as trimming only the defense budget or cutting only 鈥渨aste, fraud and abuse鈥) will suffice. And on the eve of the dreaded 鈥Tax Day鈥, this should remind us that revenues, i.e., Taxes, will (unfortunately) have to come up. But again, as only one part of the not-so-easy solution.
(Oh, and by the way, despite , I do think that gap between spending and revenues is still 鈥渉uge鈥濃揺ven if it turns out to be 鈥渙nly鈥 $1.3 trillion and not the Administration鈥檚 originally forecasted $1.6 trillion. That was yet another way in which the Obama Administration seems to be continuing the federal budget practice of the prior Administration in ways I just don鈥檛 鈥済et.鈥)
------------------------------
海角大神 has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.