海角大神

This morning President Obama establishing a new, bipartisan 鈥�National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform鈥� and made it clear that the commission would be welcome to suggest tax increases as part of their recommended policy mix for deficit reduction. And just a little later this morning, a desperate into an IRS building in Austin, Texas, because he was outraged about his high tax burden. (Read his .)

On the commission, here is budget director , and as :

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) 鈥� President Obama issued an executive order on Thursday that formally creates a bipartisan fiscal commission, a first step to forcing painful decisions needed to get the U.S. debt load under control.

Raising taxes, cutting spending and reforming Medicare and Social Security are all fair game, and thought to be impossible without the backing of both Republicans and Democrats.鈥滶verything鈥檚 on the table. That鈥檚 how this thing is going to work,鈥� the president said immediately after signing the order.

The commission must deliver a report to the president by Dec. 1 that makes recommendations for bringing annual deficits to no more than 3% of the size of the economy [by 2015]鈥�

The commission will also be expected to suggest ways to permanently lower the country鈥檚 total debt鈥�

The president formally named the two co-chairmen he has chosen for the commission: Alan Simpson, a former Republican senator from Wyoming, and Erskine Bowles, a Democrat who served as White House chief of staff under President Clinton.

He said the two men 鈥渁re taking on the impossible: they鈥檙e going to try to restore reason to the fiscal debate.鈥濃��

Deficit hawks say that the country cannot adequately address the looming fiscal shortfalls without addressing both taxes and spending.

The presidentially-appointed commission might not be as 鈥渢oothy鈥� as a Congressionally-legislated commission, but (again, from the CNN story):

鈥�there is a chance that recommendations from the presidential commission will be given serious consideration. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., have given their assurances 鈥� in writing 鈥� that they will bring the group鈥檚 recommendations to the floor for procedural votes before the end of the year. The House will only take them up, however, if they pass the Senate first.

Voting for the commission鈥檚 recommendations will likely be a tough pill for both parties. But the idea behind a bipartisan panel is that it can give political cover to lawmakers since no recommendation can be made unless it has the support of 14 of the 18 commissioners.

to emphasize that the toughest obstacle to establishing fiscal sustainability isn鈥檛 in figuring out the right economic policies, but rather in having the political will to see them through (emphasis added):

The good news from the Clinton experience is that the chronicle of debt foretold in Obama鈥檚 budget is perfectly consistent with a return to fiscal sanity much sooner. The bad news is that our bipartisan blend of fiscal dishonesty and political calculation has reached the point where it鈥檚 hard to know who will spark the debate we need about the real choices America faces.

Republicans act as if near-term deficits are a bad thing, when in fact the flood of spending both from the stimulus and the Federal Reserve鈥檚 creative liquidity injections brought the economy back from the brink. The new Republican 鈥渋t鈥� boy on fiscal policy, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, indulges in the mathematical and political fantasy that we can keep taxes at their historic level of 19 percent of GDP while .

Democrats, meanwhile, are boxed in by Obama鈥檚 unsustainable pledge not to raise taxes on Americans earning less than $250,000 鈥� a policy that only 鈥渨orks鈥� if we think we can borrow all the cash for the baby boomers鈥� retirement from China. Nor will Democrats explain to their liberal base that trimming Social Security benefits for better-off retirees will be a progressive way to fund better teachers for poor children in the era of permanent fiscal pressure ahead.

It鈥檚 such a surreal moment that admissions of cowardice somehow pass for evidence of fiscal rectitude. Whatever its merits 鈥� and let鈥檚 all wish it well 鈥� the very need for Obama鈥檚 new fiscal commission amounts to an extraordinary confession.

鈥淲e refuse to risk our hold on power,鈥� our leaders are essentially telling us, 鈥渂y coming clean on our own about the tax increases and spending cuts we know are needed to pass a sound nation to our children.鈥� Thus 鈥減olitical leadership鈥� becomes an oxymoron. Odds are we鈥檒l fix the budget once enough of us show our leaders it鈥檚 safe to do what needs to be done鈥�

The late , one of the co-founders of the , said at Concord鈥檚 birth in 1992 that:

鈥淲e are better than what we are being asked to be by our leaders.鈥�

Now, we who work at 迟辞诲补测鈥檚 Concord Coalition must still hold some degree of optimism on the being 鈥渂etter鈥� part (or else why would we keep doing what we do); see our participation on this . But I have to admit that (the motive for) 迟辞诲补测鈥檚 plane crash in Austin, and the result of two recent polls on the willingness of Americans to make the tough choices to reduce the deficit, do challenge that optimism. First, a Rasmussen poll (discussed in further detail by ) suggests that many Americans (particularly Republicans) would rather have budget deficits and tax cuts than a balanced budget with higher taxes. (Never mind that there鈥檚 no such thing as a 鈥渇ree鈥� tax cut and that deficit-financed tax cuts just turn into much larger required tax increases in the future.) Additionally, a that was cited in yesterday鈥檚 NYTimes told us that Americans believe Bush Administration policies are to blame for the large deficits but that they鈥檙e not willing to reduce the deficit by cutting health care or education or (even) military spending. One question Jackie did not report on was the following (#39): 鈥淭he Obama administration has proposed letting the tax cuts passed in 2001 expire for households earning about $250,000 a year or more. This would increase federal income taxes for those people. Do you think this proposal is a good idea or a bad idea?鈥� The responses: 62% said 鈥済ood idea,鈥� 31% said 鈥渂ad idea,鈥� and 7% said 鈥渄on鈥檛 know.鈥� But that is not surprising, because far more than 62% of the people are being asked about a tax increase on someone else.

So the question about the tax increase on the rich is not a very helpful one, because the response only reflects the perception suggested by the first (tongue-in-cheek) comment in the story about the Rasmussen poll:

I favor balancing the budget by raising everyone鈥檚 taxes but mine. I also want a magic pony.

All this empirical evidence on how much Americans understand the deficit (not very well) and what they want to do about it (nothing themselves, if they can help it) tells me that the first thing the President鈥檚 fiscal commission needs to do is to start getting out there and talking with real Americans, educating them about why we even need to worry about the budget deficit, and asking them about the (hard) choices they鈥檙e willing to make (or not). Once Americans better understand how deficits adversely affect the economy and hence impose broadly distributed costs on society, the question that needs to be asked is not just about the kind of broad-impact spending cuts and narrow-impact (only on the rich) tax increases people would be willing to see, but whether they鈥檇 be willing to see higher taxes as part of a deficit-reduction package, even if those taxes are their own. More specifically, if the President鈥檚 commission quickly comes to the realization that not raising taxes on households under $250,000 is NOT an option, would a majority of Americans still say 鈥測es鈥� to the survey question on the 2001 tax cuts if the income floor were struck from it?

Are we Americans indeed better than our leaders have (thus far) asked us to be?

.

-----------------------------------

海角大神 has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Their postings appear here on the Monitor's Money site as well as on their own individual blog sites. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the blogger's own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.