Comcast buys Time Warner Cable. What does it mean for customers?
The country鈥檚 two biggest cable television giants just became one behemoth.
Comcast, the largest cable provider in the US, announced on Thursday that it had agreed to buy Time Warner Cable, the second-largest, for $45.2 billion. If approved, the deal will give Comcast a presence in 19 of the nations鈥� 20 biggest media markets and make it far and away the top provider of broadband Internet in the country. The bid crushed efforts to acquire Time Warner by Charter Communications, which had been trying to engineer a takeover deal for months.
For investors, especially Time Warner Cable shareholders, the merger is cause for celebration. In a tax-free, all-stock deal, Comcast will pay TW investors $159 per share, buying 284.9 million shares in all. Time Warner stock jumped over 9 percent on the announcement Thursday, though Comcast shares are down 3 percent. 鈥淚t鈥檚 good for the industry, because the financial leverage will be better than if Charter had bought Time Warner,鈥� says Laura Martin, a Los Angeles-based media analyst for Needham & Co., an equity research firm based in New York. 鈥淎nd it鈥檚 a tax-free deal [for Time Warner shareholders], so that鈥檚 great for investors.鈥�
The muddier question, though, is whether one company exerting nearly total dominance in the cable TV realm will be a good thing for customers. Comcast, predictably, says of course. 鈥淭his transaction will create a leading technology and innovation company, differentiated by its ability to deliver ground-breaking products on a superior network while leveraging a national platform to create operating efficiencies and economies of scale,鈥� the company鈥檚鈥檚 announcement of the deal reads.
Ms. Martin argues that Comcast鈥檚 omnipresence could give it unparalleled negotiating power with networks and other content providers, which presumably would make channel blackouts like this one聽a rarity. In theory, that could help keep subscriber fees more stable.
鈥淎nd it鈥檚 good for consumers because Comcast has the most technologically advanced cable systems,鈥� she says. 鈥淐onsumers want more services and more product offerings, and for Time Warner customers, Comcast can give them that.鈥�
Furthermore, the deal, which will add about 8 million current Time Warner customers to Comcast鈥檚 approximately 22 million, won鈥檛 mean fewer cable TV options for most consumers because the two companies don鈥檛 overlap in any markets. But don鈥檛 expect service to get cheaper. 鈥淲hen you take a competitor out of the mix, prices generally go up,鈥� says Jeff Kagan, a media industry analyst based in Atlanta. 鈥淸Time Warner] isn鈥檛 technically a competitor, because they鈥檙e in different local markets, but this does make it easier for them to increase prices if they wanted to.鈥�
Craig Moffett, an industry analyst at MoffettNathanson in New York, predicted in a report Thursday that Comcast鈥檚 programming costs would initially increase as a result of the deal, which could affect subscribers.
Mr. Kagan agrees that the merger would mean more up-to-date pay TV services, especially for current Time Warner subscribers. 鈥淐ustomers who are interested in that will benefit,鈥� he says. 鈥淏ut some customers want to save money, or choose a less expansive version of cable TV, and that鈥檚 where Comcast and Time Warner and all the rest of them continue to drop the ball.鈥�
As cable companies face an increasing swell of alternatives to their services, including satellite TV, digital subscription services like Netflix, and Internet services from phone companies like AT&T and Verizon Fios, that oversight could (eventually) become a problem. But for now, the deal would make Comcast the strongest force in the market.
If it gets done. The merger still has to win approval from shareholders of both companies and, more importantly, from the US Department of Justice and Federal Communications Commission, which will be looking closely at whether the partnership violates any antitrust laws. Mr. Moffett argues that the problem won鈥檛 be the size of the new company鈥檚 market share (between 30 and 33 percent of the pay TV market in the US), but Comcast鈥檚 near-total control over programming. 鈥淚t will be argued that a carriage deal with a merged Comcast/TWC would suddenly be an existential requirement for programmers, and that Comcast would, in effect, have unilateral control over what content could and couldn鈥檛 be heard by the American public,鈥� he writes. 鈥淔rom a First Amendment perspective, they will argue, that is simply a bridge too far 鈥� it is the principle[sic] hurdle this deal will have to clear.鈥�
But Martin thinks the deal will 鈥渁bsolutely鈥� happen. 鈥淲e鈥檝e never had a cable deal turned down,鈥� she says. Comcast and Time Warner expect to complete the merger by the end of 2014.聽
