End of Stephen Colbert’s show illustrates risks of stirring a polarized nation to laughter
Loading...
Heard about how the White House pressured CBS to yank its flagship comedy show?
Quick recap: The president took umbrage at its jokes about him and an unpopular war. Recorded in front of a studio audience and renowned for hip musical guests, the show was a hit with the under-25 demographic. Its genial presentation, packaged in formal suits and ties, belied its edginess. An alarmed Federal Communications Commission threatened the network’s license approvals. When CBS announced the show’s cancellation, there was an outcry.
No, that isn’t a summary of what happened to “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” which is scheduled to end its run with a final show Thursday. It’s an account of how President Richard Nixon targeted “The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour,” a Vietnam-era variety show hosted by the dapper-dressed, titular siblings. But CBS’ cancellation of Mr. Colbert’s show shares parallels with that 1969 incident. As does the Trump administration’s clashes with ABC late-night host Jimmy Kimmel.
Why We Wrote This
“The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” found success as it became more political and biting at a moment of polarization. Can humor still bring us together?
In common, these incidents highlight how political comedy can sometimes be a serious matter with high stakes. Sometimes. The relevance of political humor fluctuates depending on how well joke-tellers adapt to changing political mores. At a time of fragmented audience share, Mr. Colbert and Mr. Kimmel are registering their greatest societal impact in years. They’ve pivoted from the genteel tone that talk shows were once known for and, instead, have targeted the Trump administration with sharp jabs. Just as abrasive? President Donald Trump’s rhetorical counterpunches. But viewership wins for comedians might come at the cost of perpetuating polarization rather than using humor to bring people together.
“Political comedy in the U.S. has remembered how to be vicious and how to be vulgar in ways that haven’t been seen for maybe a century,” says Nicholas Holm, editor of Comedy Studies, whose new issue is titled “The State of Political Comedy.” “At the same time, the Trump administration has sanctioned it, has given it power by taking it so seriously and being so upset by it.”
Gloves come off
When Mr. Colbert succeeded David Letterman, he ditched the character of a Fox News-like conservative that he played first on “The Daily Show” and then on the satirical spinoff series, “The Colbert Report.” He was fond of invoking the term “truthiness.” Now, he was just himself. Though Mr. Colbert’s talk show started out apolitical, he changed tack when ratings dipped. That was in 2016, the year in which Mr. Trump first became the Republican nominee for president.
The candidate’s bluster and mannerisms were ripe for late-night jokes. But a deeper shift had taken hold. Since the early 1990s, late-night hosts began to increasingly target Republican election candidates more often than Democrats, according to an analysis by political scientists Stephen J. Farnsworth and S. Robert Lichter.
“In 2020, when we looked at the jokes that were devoted to Trump or [Joe] Biden, Trump got 96% of the jokes,” says Mr. Farnsworth, co-author of “Late-Night in Washington.”
At first, television comedians made jests that characterized Mr. Trump as dumb. Consequently, comedians such as Jon Stewart and his protégés John Oliver and Samantha Bee were accused of coming across as smug. Late-night hosts then tried a different tack: portraying the president as an authoritarian who threatens democratic norms. Mr. Colbert recently told The New York Times, “That’s not a partisan position.” In turn, President Trump has insulted Mr. Colbert, Mr. Kimmel, and NBC’s Seth Meyers.
In 2025, CBS announced it would be ending “The Late Show,” calling it a financial decision. Puck News reported that, according to a CBS insider, “The Late Show” was losing between $40 to $50 million a year. CBS had already canceled “The Late Late Show with James Corden” in 2023. But the timing was right after CBS settled a lawsuit with the president. It also coincided with CBS’ parent company, Paramount Global, seeking to merge with Skydance Media. The deal required Trump administration approval. In response, Mr. Colbert said, “The gloves are off.”
Going political
Last month, Mr. Kimmel joked on air, “You know how sometimes you wake up in the morning and the first lady puts out a statement demanding you be fired? We’ve all been there, right?” Mr. Kimmel’s edgy jokes have upset the White House, including first lady Melania Trump, on several occasions. Last year, ABC suspended the show, then brought it back following a public outcry. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, a Trump appointee, recently launched an early review of ABC’s license renewals.
“The head of the FCC is saying, ‘Oh no, this review of the affiliates ... it has nothing to do with that. You know, it’s just coincidence.’ But of course everybody knows that that’s not true,” says Kliph Nesteroff, author of “Outrageous: A History of Showbiz and the Culture Wars.” He adds that the Trump administration has “brought both of these shows more attention at a time when they were receiving less attention.”
When the late-night hosts became more partisan, it created a gap in the market for conservatives who felt disenfranchised. Many have never forgiven Stephen Colbert for a skit promoting COVID-19 vaccines in 2021. That same year, Fox News introduced its own late-night show, “Gutfeld!,” which now garners larger audiences than any of the network counterparts. Other comics, such as Tony Hinchcliffe and Dave Smith, who lean right or mock political correctness, have gained traction in comedy clubs and on social media. But political comedy tends to be siloed.
“Although it’s not even that often, audience members will bristle or complain about the vibe of the political humor coming from the stage in a way where they used to basically just laugh at it,” says Noam Dworman, owner of the Comedy Cellar in New York City. “Politics is very divisive now in a way it never used to be.”
There are still comics who are “equal opportunity offenders.” Case in point: Bill Maher, host of HBO’s “Real Time,” aims for substantive discussions of important issues. Former “Saturday Night Live” cast member Colin Quinn lambastes every political persuasion, but he also looks at issues such as the national debt that American voters can widely agree on. Mr. Dworman says very few comedians are able to transcend partisanship quite like Andrew Schulz. The edgy comic, who hosted Mr. Trump on his YouTube show in 2024 but now regrets voting for him, is hard to pin down politically.
“He does seem to draw people from a wide range of opinions,” says Mr. Dworman. “With a twinkle in his eye and a tremendous amount of charm, I think he does actually lower the temperature with some people by very skillfully exposing each side to the other side.”
Humor amid polarization
The end of Mr. Colbert’s show reflects the challenges of maintaining the talk show as a TV product, says Mr. Farnsworth, the “Late-Night in Washington” co-author. But today’s pluralistic, democratized media landscape of YouTube, podcasts, and social media offers low barriers to launch new ventures – including uncensored political comedy.
“The current media environment has a leveling effect,” says Mr. Farnsworth. “Anybody can be a late-night comic on YouTube or on a podcast. ... That creates lots of opportunities for people who have something that they think is funny to say.”
Mr. Colbert told The New York Times he still wants to do comedy after his show ends. In the meantime, he hasn’t let up on President Trump during the final weeks of “The Late Show.” In 1968, the hosts of “The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour” appeared to soften. They penned a letter to retiring President Lyndon B. Johnson, apologizing if their show had been heavy-handed. He wrote back.
“It is part of the price of leadership of this great and free nation to be the target of clever satirists,” said President Johnson. “May we never grow so somber or self-important that we fail to appreciate the humor in our lives.”